The birth of
our universe, namely the Big Bang, is described by scientists as a

*'quantum event*'. What does that mean?
All natural
phenomena are governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. However, much of our
day-to-day activity and experience can be well-explained in terms of the laws
of

*classical mechanics*, propounded, among others, by Newton. Classical mechanics is a good approximation (but only an approximation) of quantum mechanics under certain conditions. Newton's three laws of motion are examples of laws of classical mechanics.
When does the
approximation become invalid, and it becomes necessary to invoke laws of
quantum mechanics directly for explaining a natural phenomenon? One situation
is when the spatial dimensions are extremely small. A tennis ball is so big
that classical mechanics is adequate for describing its trajectory. An electron
is so small that only quantum mechanics can explain its behaviour properly.

Is an electron
a particle or a wave? Experimental evidence says that it is both. An electron has
a certain mass and electric charge. If we apply an electric field, we can
accelerate the motion of the electron, which we can correctly calculate by
assuming that it is a particle having the known mass and charge. So it is a
particle.

But now
consider the famous double-slit experiment first performed by Davisson and
Germer in 1927. They shot a beam of electrons through two parallel slits, and
recorded the positions of the electrons on a flat screen on the other side. What
they found was that the electrons behaved, not as particles moving in straight
lines, but as waves, forming a

*diffraction pattern*like the one you would expect from a beam of light. This established the*wave-particle duality*of elementary particles like electrons.
There are
serious consequences of this conclusion. A particle can be assigned a certain
position or 'coordinates' in space. But we cannot do that for a wave. Consider
the familiar sound waves in air. As a sound wave travels, there is compression
and rarefaction in air. Some of this vibration of air reaches your ears, and
you sense the sound. But can you tell that the sound wave is here, and not
there? No. It is everywhere; with different intensities, of course.

So, if an
electron has wave properties, it means that it is everywhere at the same time! We
say that it is

*delocalized*. This is one of the shocks that quantum theory inflicts on us. There are many more. And yet, it is the most successful and the most thoroughly tested theory, or model of reality, ever.
The wave
nature of electrons is a reality. Otherwise we would not have been able to
build the very important and much used

*electron microscopes*. In these devices, electrons do what is done by light in an optical microscope.
Just as
electrons have wave properties, light can also behave as if it is a collection
of particles called 'photons'. This was established in 1905 by Einstein for an
experiment involving the so-called 'photoelectric effect', and he was awarded
the Nobel Prize for this work in 1921. We say that electromagnetic radiation
(which includes light, as also X-rays, gamma-rays, etc.) exists as discrete
packets of energy, or 'quanta', called photons.

Now consider
an experiment in which an electron is more conveniently interpreted as behaving
like a particle, rather than a wave. We can assign a position and a momentum
(or velocity) to it. In a 1-dimensional situation, the position is, say,

*x*, and the momentum is*p*. Let ∆_{x}*x*and ∆*p*be the errors or uncertainties in the measurement or specification of these quantities. In classical physics, it is possible for these errors or uncertainties to be arbitrarily small, even zero. Not so in quantum physics. There is this famous principle called the_{x}*Heisenberg uncertainty principle*, according to which the product ∆*x.*∆*p*cannot be less than a certain quantity of the order of the Planck constant,_{x}*h*. The principle says that ∆*x.*∆*p*≥_{x}*h*/(4*π*). Of course, the Planck constant is a very very small quantity, but it is not zero.
This principle
implies that if ∆

*x*is nearly zero, then ∆*p*is extremely large, and_{x}*vice versa*. And large ∆*p*means large uncertainty in kinetic energy (because momentum and kinetic energy are directly proportional to each other)._{x}
There are
several 'conjugate' pairs of quantities for which the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
must be obeyed. Energy

*E*and time*t*are another such pair, and the principle states that ∆*E.*∆*t*≥*h*/(4*π*). This provides a very important loophole (!) in the principle of conservation of energy, because the uncertainty principle says that energy conservation*can*be violated by an amount ∆*E*, provided it occurs for a time less than ∆*t*.
Back to the
Big Bang event. This was a quantum event because the spatial dimension of the
system was extremely small: ∆x ≈ 0.

And this, in
turn, means that ∆

*p*, and therefore ∆_{x}*E*, could become arbitrarily large at the moment of the Big Bang. Our universe was born out of such a*quantum fluctuation*.
This energy
fluctuation got sustenance from the fact that the gravitational interaction was
born at the same instance, and the rest of the story is as given in Part 2 of
this series.

Admittedly,
this is a simplistic narrative, but should be enough to convey to the lay
person how something could emerge out of 'nothing', without having to postulate
the pre-existence of a Creator.

For those who
can stomach it, here is an excerpt from a book by Seth Lloyd (2006):

Quantum mechanics describes energy in terms of quantum fields, a kind of underlying fabric of the universe, whose weave makes up the elementary particles – photons, electrons, quarks. The energy we see around us, then – in the form of Earth, stars, light, heat – was drawn out of the underlying quantum fields by the expansion of our universe. Gravity is an attractive force that pulls things together. . . As the universe expands (which it continues to do), gravity sucks energy out of the quantum fields. The energy in the quantum fields is almost always positive, and this positive energy is exactly balanced by the negative energy of gravitational attraction. As the expansion proceeds, more and more positive energy becomes available, in the form of matter and light – compensated for by the negative energy in the attractive force of the gravitational field.